<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adgitize Reverts To Old Prices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lmblog.co.uk/adgitize-reverts-to-old-prices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lmblog.co.uk/adgitize-reverts-to-old-prices/</link>
	<description>Simple Yet Good</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:08:22 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LM-BLOG</title>
		<link>http://lmblog.co.uk/adgitize-reverts-to-old-prices/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>LM-BLOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lmblog.co.uk/?p=807#comment-197</guid>
		<description>@Martn -- As always our points are well thought out and Iagree with what you are saying. I hope you enjoyed Christmas and New Year, along with your family also.

@AgentMango -- All advertising has a fairly high bounce rate. If Adgitize decides to try to implement a more specif system which would allow similar sites to be grouped then the bounce rate will go down, Ken has mentioned this before I think.

 Personally I have a 56% bounce rate from adgitize. This is dropping however and I am beginning to get many more returning visitors and more subscribers.

@Emm -- I agree, those 2 second visits are people just trying to make their 50 clicks, with no interest in the blog itself. 
 
For me Adgitize has brought in a huge number of new visitors. I am getting more regular comments now and in most cases from new people. 

Adgtize is improving all the time so time will show if traffic is meaningfull overall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Martn &#8212; As always our points are well thought out and Iagree with what you are saying. I hope you enjoyed Christmas and New Year, along with your family also.</p>
<p>@AgentMango &#8212; All advertising has a fairly high bounce rate. If Adgitize decides to try to implement a more specif system which would allow similar sites to be grouped then the bounce rate will go down, Ken has mentioned this before I think.</p>
<p> Personally I have a 56% bounce rate from adgitize. This is dropping however and I am beginning to get many more returning visitors and more subscribers.</p>
<p>@Emm &#8212; I agree, those 2 second visits are people just trying to make their 50 clicks, with no interest in the blog itself. </p>
<p>For me Adgitize has brought in a huge number of new visitors. I am getting more regular comments now and in most cases from new people. </p>
<p>Adgtize is improving all the time so time will show if traffic is meaningfull overall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emm</title>
		<link>http://lmblog.co.uk/adgitize-reverts-to-old-prices/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Emm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 22:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lmblog.co.uk/?p=807#comment-196</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t mind the high bounce rate, I minded people spending less than 2 seconds on my site!!!  From what I can see on Google Analytcs over 6 months and 3 sites, Adgitize brought no meaningful traffic whatsoever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t mind the high bounce rate, I minded people spending less than 2 seconds on my site!!!  From what I can see on Google Analytcs over 6 months and 3 sites, Adgitize brought no meaningful traffic whatsoever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AgentMango</title>
		<link>http://lmblog.co.uk/adgitize-reverts-to-old-prices/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>AgentMango</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 13:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lmblog.co.uk/?p=807#comment-193</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good news. Bad news is im still not gonna renew my ad. Hate the bounce rate. lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good news. Bad news is im still not gonna renew my ad. Hate the bounce rate. lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin@Cornyman's Money-Blog</title>
		<link>http://lmblog.co.uk/adgitize-reverts-to-old-prices/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin@Cornyman's Money-Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 23:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lmblog.co.uk/?p=807#comment-192</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure if Ken should have waited until the payment proofs in January would have been presented by many active advertisers/publishers. Sure, the members who haven&#039;t been active in clicking and blogging daily &quot;loose&quot; 10$ more which is a big deal for hobby blogger.

We will see how much the members with 400+ will loose in earnings from mid January on and if Adgitize will loose again some members as many members just advertised because they could break even with this program without investing money.

Merry Christmas to you and your family!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if Ken should have waited until the payment proofs in January would have been presented by many active advertisers/publishers. Sure, the members who haven&#8217;t been active in clicking and blogging daily &#8220;loose&#8221; 10$ more which is a big deal for hobby blogger.</p>
<p>We will see how much the members with 400+ will loose in earnings from mid January on and if Adgitize will loose again some members as many members just advertised because they could break even with this program without investing money.</p>
<p>Merry Christmas to you and your family!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LM-BLOG</title>
		<link>http://lmblog.co.uk/adgitize-reverts-to-old-prices/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>LM-BLOG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 13:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lmblog.co.uk/?p=807#comment-191</guid>
		<description>I am fairly happy to see this change being made however I am also disappointed that members were not able to try and help Adgitize grow. 

This down in prices could hinder growth in the next few months but I am sure Ken will get it all sorted :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am fairly happy to see this change being made however I am also disappointed that members were not able to try and help Adgitize grow. </p>
<p>This down in prices could hinder growth in the next few months but I am sure Ken will get it all sorted <img src='http://lmblog.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Baines</title>
		<link>http://lmblog.co.uk/adgitize-reverts-to-old-prices/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Baines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 10:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lmblog.co.uk/?p=807#comment-190</guid>
		<description>Great news - glad to see Adgitize back on track!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great news &#8211; glad to see Adgitize back on track!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
